I have 2 Marauders at present and planning on a third. The idea was to build a custom LW .25 for longer range shooting, and have 2 .22's for the majority of my shooting. That was before Crosman announced their .25. Faced with the prospect of buying 2 more .25 caliber LW barrels at over $100 each, my plan seemed sensable. Now I'm rethinking. Heck, when Crosman gets the .25 rolling I'll be able to buy a barrel for $20, and even get stuff like a .25 bolt that just drops in! Since PCPs tend to be more efficient with larger calibers, why not just go 25 all the way? That's what I'm asking myself, and I'd like to hear what you think. Some advantages of the .22 are greater pellet choice and lower pellet cost. Truth is though, of the dozens of choices, I only like a few and I can get those in .25. If I stick to one caliber I only need a couple types of pellets instead of stocking both calibers too. I'm not a real high volume shooter so the pellet cost is not an issue. One of the guns I have planned is a carbine, and I'm pretty sure I can get more out of the short format with the .25.
So the question that I'm throwing out for debate is: What is the point of owning a .22 when you can get a .25? Is there a significant downside that I'm missing?
Teryx